Approximately 40,000 sheep burned to death on the Farid Fares in 1980. 67,000 sheep burned to death at sea on the Uniceb in 1996. The Ocean Drover can carry 75,000 sheep. If today's fire had happened at sea then there is no doubt about the outcome: 75,000 sheep burned at sea in 2014 and one major live export disaster due to fire every 11.5 years.
Even in Port, firefighters from a huge number of units could not control the fire in this ship. Just another incident that highlights the inherent dangers in exporting Australian animals alive on ships.
0 Comments
The Ocean Drover, with no sheep on board, is on fire in Fremantle Port. Burning for a few hours (at this stage). So, a temporary reprieve for 70,000 or so sheep (or 18,000 cattle) although questions have to be asked as to how they are going to be managed at the feedlot now that they are unlikely to be going anywhere soon.
Also spare a thought for the crew members who have been injured in the fire ... probably foreign workers far from home. The recent high mortality flight to Singapore is yet another high mortality flight to have occurred in the last year.
Whilst Ms Penfold of ALEC points out that there was only one other high mortality sheep flight in 2013, she conveniently didnt mention that since September 2013, there have now been at least four high mortality live export flights - yes two of the three (Reports 47 and 48) were cattle. So no high mortality flights at all between Feb 2010 and Sept 2013 but now at least four between September 2013 and early October 2014 So an unprecedented 13 months of high mortality air incidents it would seem and all somehow cite some failure in ventilation even if no mechanical problems found. Are planes suddenly breaking down all the time? Or are they perhaps being overstocked? Are the animals being left on the Australian airport tarmac in the full sun before they get on the plane (as shown in a photo sent anonymously to VALE)? Whatever the cause, these animals, 39.3% of them on one flight, suffered unacceptably. Watch this space and read the Mortality Investigation Reports 47-49. Well its not just the Gibb. The Report to the Commissioner of Soil and Land Conservation on the condition of the WA pastoral resource base 2013 found the following:
"The frequency of grasses of desirable perennial species is declining and... it appears that stocking rates are commonly excessive and rangeland is deteriorating as a result. That this decline is occurring during generally favourable seasons in some locations is particularly disturbing suggesting that the rangelands are unable to develop resilience during favourable seasons to assist in survival during less favourable seasons... This report indicates that ongoing rangeland degradation continues under present management on many leases and that such management is therefore not in accordance with Section 95 of the Land Administration Act 1997. Action to address this situation will not be simple but is necessary and should be immediate." So, there it is: West Australian land is being trashed. Consequences: environmental and animal welfare disasters. And thats the live export industry before the cattle even leave this country! So....Hansard for September 2013 has our veterinarian senator telling parliament:
"For the period of July to December 2013, our livestock exporters exported 441,644 cattle. Of that number, only 535—0.12 per cent—were lost during the voyage.Let me put it into perspective. I gave you the figures of 0.12 per cent for cattle and 0.15 per cent... the mortality levels of the cattle on the range lands—excluding drought and overstocking, which was caused by the disastrous decision of the then Labor government to ban the export of live cattle to Indonesia—were about three to eight per cent per annum. Compare that with 0.12 per cent... The mortality rate for human beings in this country is 0.6 per cent, some four times the mortality rate of cattle on ships going to our destination ports..". With respect Senator, you cant statistically compare 0.12% mortality on variable length voyages (mostly 5-10 days) with an annual 3-8% (or 0.6%) mortality, that is over 365 days. Cant be done.. statistically and scientifically INVALID! Speaking to the Joint Select Committee on Northern Australia Mr Jack Burton (Yeeda; Kimberley Meat) said "There are a lot of places—some of the places up the Gibb and places like that—where they will muster 1,000 cattle and get 50 on a boat—50 out of 1,000—and so they just kick the gates on them."
Presumably 'kicking the gates on them' results in the remaining emaciated cattle littering the Gibb. But, in addition to animal welfare issues, the question has to be asked: What sort of industry operates with 5% efficiency business model? A good wet season and a record live export year, yet this is what "the dry" brings for cattle on some stations. Rain and feed are still several months away. A timely reminder to international tourists that Australia cares about its animals and has the best animal welfare in the world?
At 10pm on 18th August Fremantle lost their train service after 2 ships were pushed into the bridge. Fremantle Port have been strongly criticised. The Australian Institute of Marine Power Engineers says the writing was on the wall by about noon. "The harbour master should have had the tugs on gale watch" they said. Gale alert means tugs are required to be on standby at the Port but the Port never issued a gale watch so they werent available when the first vessel broke away at 10pm. Fortunately no trains were affected as there is no early warning for bridge accidents in Fremantle, despite this being the second episode of ship-induced bridge damage in the last 12 months.
The irony is, of course, that it is the supposedly stringent Fremantle Port Security that banned all public access to Fremantle Port after VALE spokesperson, Dr Sue Foster wrote to get official approval for observing live export loading, something she had been doing legally for 18 months (with informal police approval for standing in the designated public access point). VALE is obviously far more of a threat to Port security than gale force winds it would seem! In addition to "streamlining" ESCAS (which apparently wont weaken animal welfare....), federal agriculture minister, Mr Barnaby Joyce, has plans to exempt Saudi Arabia from ESCAS. Saudi slaughtering facilities are government owned so "well run" according to My Joyce. We assume he is going on Colin Barnett's wonderfully well informed assessment of Saudi (without having ever seen the facilities of course).
The Saudis will not accept ESCAS and they have oil....so, guess who will roll over.?...and no guesses as to what will suffer. Egyptian facilities, also ESCAS exempt were government run and it took an Egyptian government vet to blow the whistle there. Interestingly, this latest blow to animal welfare has been splashed around UK (See http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/sep/12/animal-welfare-laws-anger-as-barnaby-joyce-plans-to-exempt-saudi-arabia). Dutch company Vroon is currently launching the next generation livestock carriers. Apparently, they are fitted with animal welfare facilities exceeding Australian regulations (not so hard!) and incorporate a revolutionary bow design that will ensure maximum comfort for cargo and crew.
“Watering and feeding happens automatically, and the ventilation systems can renew the air in the stables up to 45 times an hour.” Hopefully, that will at least signal the end of the ancient, converted, non-purpose-built tubs currently plying the trade. Pity Vroon isnt managing ESCAS at the other end to ensure appropriate livestock handling and a stunned slaughter. Maybe they need to integrate....or ...there is always the option of just carrying the meat! |
Archives
June 2024
Categories |